Article: Which short-selling regulation is the least damaging to market efficiency? Evidence from Europe

Article - Academic

Which short-selling regulation is the least damaging to market efficiency? Evidence from Europe

Oscar Bernal, Astrid Herinckx, Ariane Szafarz

International Review of Law and Economics, 1 March 2014

Exploiting cross-sectional and time-series variations in European regulations during the July 2008–June 2009 period, we show that: (1) prohibition on covered short selling raises bid-ask spread and reduces trading volume, (2) prohibition on naked short selling raises both volatility and bid-ask spread, (3) disclosure requirements raise volatility and reduce trading volume, and (4) no regulation is effective against price decline. Overall, all short-sale regulations harm market efficiency. However, naked short-selling prohibition is the only regulation that leaves volumes unchanged while addressing the failure to deliver. Therefore, we argue that this is the least damaging to market efficiency.

Read full article.

THE DOLLAR HAS NO INTRINSIC VALUE : DO YOUR ASSETS?